Reference Case: Jia v. a Technology Company, Fei Mou, and Wang Mou

A decision to shorten shareholders' subscribed capital deadlines, even when framed as a charter amendment, directly affects each shareholder's deadline benefit and core shareholder rights rather than ordinary management matters. If controlling shareholders use a capital-majority vote to accelerate another shareholder's contribution deadline without notice or consent, that vote can amount to abuse of shareholder rights and the resolution may be declared invalid.