最高人民法院2025年典型民商事案例;裁判日期2025年3月31日

SPC Typical Case: An Investment Company v. A Group Company

Where the evidence proves that a shareholder fully paid its capital increase and no evidence shows withdrawal of that contribution, unusual account movements alone do not justify adding the shareholder as a judgment debtor for company liabilities. Capital adequacy and shareholder limited liability must both be protected.

Holding

Where the evidence proves that a shareholder fully paid its capital increase and no evidence shows withdrawal of that contribution, unusual account movements alone do not justify adding the shareholder as a judgment debtor for company liabilities. Capital adequacy and shareholder limited liability must both be protected.

Issues

shareholder limited liabilitypaid-in capital increasewithdrawal of contributionaddition as judgment debtor